West-sponsored terrorism in Syria boomerangs

0

There should be an open debate on Muslim grievances against West and Western grievances against Muslims, and a solution has to be found out, which is acceptable to both. Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism and Judaism will also have to realize that the forces of New World Order are primarily against religion because religious morality is a threat to their commercial morality, and they should realize that instead of fighting each other on the basis of identity, they need to unite on the basis of their common values. 

Villainy almost always if not always boomerangs. The problem is that villainy rather than admitting its own always labels others’ acts as villainy. The thieves call everyone else a thief, and the violent call others violent. West has left almost everyone far behind in this art. It has been sermonizing the Muslim world day and night with renewed vigour since the Paris attacks on “Freedom of Expression”, and is busy arresting Muslims for “Hate speech”. For them, attacking Muslims with the charge of intolerance towards others and towards “freedom” and using this freedom to cause unbearable mental violence to Muslims through repeated questioning of Islam and depiction of its symbols in satirical and obscene ways is absolutely admirable but if Muslims react with anguish towards their concepts, this becomes a hate-speech, which in their view goes beyond “freedom of expression”. What a travesty of justice! What a travesty of freedom! The truth is that no ideology has been more intolerant of other ideologies than Westernism. While they abuse Muslims without pause for their belief in Islam as the best, they are never tired of telling the supremacy of their own ideology and its symbols, and claiming that they are most civilized in the world. While they judge and categorize every act on the basis of “Us” and “They”, they blame Muslims for thinking in those terms.

The cause of worry for the mankind is that West continues to be the most powerful lobby in the world, and therefore they can do and say whatever they like without being directly challenged in a legitimate way. As there is no legal way to take them to task for their own acts of violence with innumerable killings, for their extreme ways of obscenity and intemperateness, which result in millions of deaths through diseases and crimes, some elements resort to illegitimate ways of avenging the perpetual insults, and then these are used to further fuel the war, which West has imposed on the whole humanity. And if you start describing the facts about West, they start calling it propaganda of victimhood and hate speech.

What is still most unfortunate is that West refuses to understand that violence breeds violence and hatred breeds hatred. With their fire power, they can certainly avenge one death with 1000 killings, but they cannot totally stop their own deaths if they continue with this practice of vengeance. And they should realize that the damage to their own country, population and ideology would sooner or later become too huge for them to bear even if they cause much greater damage to those whom they want to subdue.

Today the Europe is confronted with the problem of “terrorists” returning from Syria and Iraq, which number in thousands. But they are refusing to admit that these “terrorists” were in fact fighters they sent or let go with deliberate tacitness to Syria because the Europe at that time considered them freedom fighters against Syrian regime, which they loathed. Without the support of European governments, these thousands could never have travelled to Syria and Iraq, and could not have amassed the kind of weaponry they possess. The war in Syria was being openly financed by Western countries, and the “fighters” killing the Syrian army personnel and civilians were being hailed in no uncertain terms. Bashar-al Assad was the villain then and he had to be removed, even if his removal resulted in deaths of hundreds of thousands of human beings. To their surprise, Assad proved too much for them, and defeated West-sponsored rebellion in a decisive manner. Squarely defeated, ISIS entered Iraq, and the European fighters started going back to their countries of origin. Perhaps the Western governments believed that these would not return live, but they did. Coming from the midst of violence, and realizing their folly in becoming pawns in the hands of their own governments, they were filled with hatred. Moist of them controlled their anger, but some could not, and it is these few who might have become involved in using the West-supplied weapons against their own countrymen.

The most unfortunate part of the whole scenario is that instead of realizing its own faults, and instead of trying to win back the Muslims through offers of reconciliation, they are engaged in spreading Islamophobia to the hilt. Instead of counting the dead they killed in Muslim countries, they are simply counting the few the Muslim “terrorists” have killed. Instead of trying to find out the weaknesses of their own ideologies, concepts and policies in bringing real peace to humanity, they are busy in telling Muslim World about the “weaknesses” in their Islamic beliefs. They cannot understand the simple fact that Islamic laws may appear to be harsh in method but are harbingers of peace in effect, while on the other hand, Western ways look benign in methodology but are highly dangerous in results.

If West wants peace with Muslims, it will have to revise its whole policy towards them. It will have to learn to respect their beliefs and enter into dialogue with them on the basis of mutual respect and give and take. It will have to take a decision to stop intervention in Muslim countries, and it should allow Muslim academicians to voice their criticism of Western policies. There should be an open debate on Muslim grievances against West and Western grievances against Muslims, and a solution has to be found out, which is acceptable to both. Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism and Judaism will also have to realize that the forces of New World Order are primarily against religion because religious morality is a threat to their commercial morality, and they should realize that instead of fighting each other on the basis of identity, they need to unite on the basis of their common values.

Share.

About Author

Leave A Reply